Hi, this is a comment.
To get started with moderating, editing, and deleting comments, please visit the Comments screen in the dashboard.
Commenter avatars come from Gravatar.
I would like to build a small workshop exercise around audio repair. The aim is to help participants describe what they hear before they decide which version they prefer, rather than treating every change as an improvement. A brief generated recording would provide the starting example. Every version would contain an identical stretch of the performance. A page discussing ai music artifact removal gave me a starting point for the topic, but it does not settle how to structure the exercise. I would match playback levels before presenting the versions. Participants could write down observations before seeing labels. The original excerpt needs to remain available throughout. Separate questions about texture and clarity would keep the discussion specific. We could repeat the excerpts in a different order and discuss disagreements, since a single preference vote would reveal little about the reasons behind it. What listening criteria would you add to this exercise?
Hi, this is a comment.
To get started with moderating, editing, and deleting comments, please visit the Comments screen in the dashboard.
Commenter avatars come from Gravatar.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
I would like to build a small workshop exercise around audio repair. The aim is to help participants describe what they hear before they decide which version they prefer, rather than treating every change as an improvement. A brief generated recording would provide the starting example. Every version would contain an identical stretch of the performance. A page discussing ai music artifact removal gave me a starting point for the topic, but it does not settle how to structure the exercise. I would match playback levels before presenting the versions. Participants could write down observations before seeing labels. The original excerpt needs to remain available throughout. Separate questions about texture and clarity would keep the discussion specific. We could repeat the excerpts in a different order and discuss disagreements, since a single preference vote would reveal little about the reasons behind it. What listening criteria would you add to this exercise?